Raj Kumar Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16148 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.

Raj Kumar Ranjan S/O Rajendra Saw R/O Vill. Kharra, P.O. Alinagar, P.S. Suryagarha, District- Lakhisarai.

2.

Pravin Kumar S/o Vishwanath Prasad Singh R/o Vill.- Lohasi, P.O.- Partapur, P.S. Belsand, District- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through its Secretary Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

2.

The Director (Primary Education), Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 3.

The District Magistrate, Lakhisarai, Sheohar. 4.

The District Education Officer, Lakhisarai, Sheohar. 5.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Lakhisarai, Sheohar. 6.

The Block Development Officer, Surajgarh, Lakhisarai. 7.

The Block Development Officer, Piprahi, Sheohar. 8.

The Block Education Officer Surajgarh, Lakhisarai. 9.

The Block Education Officer, Piprahi, Sheohar. 10.

The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Mohammadpur, Lakhisarai. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shashi Bhushan Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Subhash Chandra Mishra ( Sc 16 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER 01-12-2022

1. Heard the parties.

2. The counsel is ad idem that the issue involved in the present writ petition stands finally adjudicated by this court in CWJC No. 16214 of 2019 Md. Ataur Rahman & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors and connected cases decided on 19.10.2022, this Court has held as under:- CATEGORY H

Patna High Court CWJC No.16148 of 2022(2) dt.01-12-2022 2/2 "01. After having examined generally the facts of each case, this Court finds that the directions as issued herein above for each category would also govern the petitioners. Herein, it is for the State Government to examine facts of each and every teacher in terms of the order passed above. The petitioners would be free to make individual appropriate representation mentioning their own facts and the authority above as designated by the Director Education shall after referring to the directions of this Court in the preceding para's pass a speaking order.

02. State Government considering the directions issued herein above, would also take decision with reference to the present petitioners. In spite thereto, if any grievance of any individual person is not meted out, he or she shall be free to individually file an appeal before the concerned District Appellate Authority for redressal of his or her grievance.

03. The writ petitions are accordingly disposed of as directed herein above."

3. The aforesaid judgment and orders passed hereinabove shall apply mutatis mutandis to the case of the petitioners too.

4. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. (Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) amit/- U