← Library
Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/3668/2022withdrawn

Bachai Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2023-03-22Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.3668 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2018 Thana- SC/ST District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

BACHAI YADAV Son of Late Nathuni Yadav @ Mahajan Yadav Resident of Village- Bheja, Anchal- Madhepur, P.S.- Bheja, District- Madhubani 2.

PULKIT YADAV @ HUSAN YADAV Son of Late Nathuni Yadav @ Mahajan Yadav Resident of Village- Bheja, Anchal- Madhepur, P.S.- Bheja, District- Madhubani 3.

SUMRIT YADAV Son of Late Nathuni Yadav @ Mahajan Yadav Resident of Village- Bheja, Anchal- Madhepur, P.S.- Bheja, District- Madhubani 4.

RAJU YADAV Son of Bachai Yadav Resident of Village- Bheja, AnchalMadhepur, P.S.- Bheja, District- Madhubani 5.

RAJESH YADAV Son of Bachai Yadav Resident of Village- Bheja, AnchalMadhepur, P.S.- Bheja, District- Madhubani 6.

RAUSHAN YADAV Son of Sumrit Yadav Resident of Village- Bheja, Anchal- Madhepur, P.S.- Bheja, District- Madhubani ... ... Appellants.

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

SITA RAM RAM Son of Siban Ram Resident of Village- Bheja, AnchalMadhepur, P.S.- Bheja, District- Madhubani ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Md. Soban Asghar For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Binay Krishna ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 22-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned Special PP for the State.

Learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw this appeal in respect of appellant nos.1, 2, 3 and 6 submitting that during pendency of this appeal appellant nos.1, 2, 3 and 6 have already been apprehended.

Permission is granted.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3668 of 2022(2) dt.22-03-2023 2/2 Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in respect of appellant nos.1, 2, 3 and 6 only.

Now, this appeal survives only for appellant nos.4 and 5.

After some arguments, learned counsel for the appellants seek permission to withdraw this appeal with a liberty to renew his prayer for anticipatory bail before the learned Court below.

Permission is granted.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. The limitation, if any, shall be condoned.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T