Sandhya Rajak And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
Patna High Court MJC No.4123 of 2014 (3) dt.25-05-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4123 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8396 of 2013 ======================================================
1. Sandhya Rajak, wife of Suresh Baitha, resident of village-Bhopatpur, P.O.-Sisal, P.S.-Bhore, District-Gopalganj (Bihar)
2. Hemant Kumar Srivastav, son of Shashi Bhushan Lal Srivastav, resident of Village-Kharauni Vrit Tola, P.O.-Bhagwanpur, P.S.-Bhore, DistrictGopalganj (Bihar).
3. Raj Kishore Tiwari Son of Sri Shambhu Sharan Tiwari, resident of Village-Lakshmipur, P.O.-Lamichaur, Anchal Bhore, P.S.-Bhore, District-Gopalganj (Bihar)
4. Sunmita Maurya, wife of RAdha Raman Maurya Resident of VillageMohanpur, P.O.-Mohanpur, P.S.-Bhore, District-Gopalganj, (Bihar) .... .... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Sri R.K. Mahajan, the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. Sri Krishna Mohan, District Magistrate, Gopalganj, District-Gopalganj (Bihar).
4. Sri Suresh Prasad, District Education Officer, Gopalganj, District Gopalganj, (Bihar)
5. Sri Braj Nandan, District Programme Officer (Establishment), Gopalganj, District-Gopalganj (Bihar).
6. Sri Umesh Kumar Singh Block Development Office, Bhore, DistrictGopalganj (Bihar).
7. Sri Gupt Narayan Singh, Block Education Office, Bhore, DistrictGopalganj (Bihar). .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance:
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Santosh Kumar Mishra, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, A.C. to G.P.-4. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 25-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the order dated 11.08.2014 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 8396 of 2013
Patna High Court MJC No.4123 of 2014 (3) dt.25-05-2017 has been complied with, but the payment has not been made. In such view of the matter, the contempt proceeding is dropped. However, this Court trusts and hopes that the payment will be made to the petitioners in accordance with law.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U