Jitendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.18946 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -66 Year- 2015 Thana -UDWANTNAGAR District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Jitendra Yadav, Son of Anant Yadav, Resident of Village- Jaitpur, P.S.- Udwant Nagar, District- Bhojpur at Ara (Bihar). .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 23-06-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
This is an application for bail in connection with Udwant Nagar P.S.Case No. 66 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and it appears that his name transpires during course of investigation. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is not named in the FIR and later on his name transpires on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused and nothing has been recovered from his possession and no test identification parade was held and he is in custody for six months having no criminal antecedent. It has further been submitted that other coaccused persons have already been granted bail by this Court but he has not produced/annexed any copy of the order granting bail in support of his contention.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18946 of 2017 (3) dt.23-06-2017 2/2 Heard learned APP also.
Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara, in connection with Udwant Nagar P.S.Case No. 66 of 2015, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U