Most. Vibha Devi @ Vibhadevi Murari Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16896 of 2022 ====================================================== Most. Vibha Devi @ Vibhadevi Murari Singh wife of Late Murari Singh, Resident of Near Primary School, Village- Masadhi, P.S.- Gaurichak, DistrictPatna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

District Magistrate, Patna.

4.

D.C.L.R., Patna City, Patna.

5.

Circle Officer, Block Fatua, Patna.

6.

Station House Officer, Gaurichak Police Station, Patna. 7.

Ajay Kumar son of Late Naresh Singh @ Ramnaresh Singh, Resident of Village- Masadhi, P.S.- Gaurichak, District- Patna. 8.

Radhika Devi wife of Late Naresh Singh @ Ramnaresh Singh, Resident of Village- Masadhi, P.S.- Gaurichak, District- Patna. 9.

Hima Devi wife of Pram Kumar, Resident of Village- Dashrath, P.S.- Beur, District- Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Lal Babu Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sheo Shankar Prasad (Standing Counsel-8) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 22-03-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1.(i) Issuance of a direction, order or writ including writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the concerned respondent authorities to facilitate the petitioner to enter in her matrimonial house from where she has been kicked out by the respondent no. 7 & 8 with the help of other matrimonial family members and

Patna High Court CWJC No.16896 of 2022(2) dt.22-03-2023 2/2 antisocial elements;

(ii) Issuance of a direction, order or writ including writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the concerned respondent authorities to take necessary steps towards complaint filed by the petitioner with respect to illegal sale of land of the share of the petitioner by the respondent no. 7 & 8 to the respondent no. 9 and concerned respondent authorities under the state government may be directed to deny the mutation of the land sold by the respondent no. 7 & 8."

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies, as are otherwise available under the law, for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/SonalU