← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./62328/2022bail granted

Pappu Prasad @ Pappu Khatik v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-02Mr. Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62328 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-241 Year-2022 Thana- DELHA District- Gaya ====================================================== Pappu Prasad @ Pappu Khatik Son of Late Motilal Resident of Chhotaki Nawada, Gandhi Mod, P.S.- Delha, District - Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kunwar Narayan Jamuar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 02-12-2022 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State through virtual Court proceedings.

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Delha P.S. Case No. 241 of 2022 registered for the offence under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 01.08.2022.

The allegation against the petitioner is to be engaged in illegal trading/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where, there is recovery of 16.875 litres of IMFL/country made liquor from the alleged plastic jhola.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62328 of 2022(2) dt.02-12-2022 2/2 submitted that the recovery of alleged illicit liquor was not made from the conscious physical possession of this petitioner. It is pointed out that seizure list appears doubtful being not supported by independent witnesses, rather by police personnels. While concluding the argument, it has been submitted that investigation has been completed, for which, charge-sheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances as mentioned above, as seizure list appears doubtful not supported by independent witnesses coupled with the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted, let the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Delha P.S. Case No. 241 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Excise Court No. 1, Gaya/concerned court, subject to the conditions as mentioned under Section 437 (3) of the Cr.P.C. (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) pooja/- U T