Patna High CourtCR. MISC./59360/2025bail granted

Vivekanand Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-02Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59360 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-327 Year-2025 Thana- BAHADURPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Vivekanand Bhagat Son of Late Ramanand Bhagat Resident of village - Mathurapur Ward No.- 03, P.S.- Mathurapur, District - Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pushpendra Kumar Singh, Adv.

Smt. Divya Bharti, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Meena Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 327 of 2025 dated 04.07.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 334 and 303(2) of the B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, unknown miscreants are alleged to have stolen the electric equipments worth Rs. 2 lakhs from the godown of the informant. It is further alleged that when the informant reached the godown then he found that the lock of the roof was broken and copper wire, stabilizer, changer, mic, unit fan motor were missing.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59360 of 2025(2) dt.02-09-2025 2/2 that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has surfaced in this case during the course of investigation. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 16.07.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Darbhanga in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 327 of 2025.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T