← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16815/2018disposed

Subhash Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2020-01-06The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16815 of 2018 ====================================================== Subhash Prasad Yadav Son of Premadhar Ray R/o Village Hetanpur, P.O. Madhopur, P.S. Sahpur, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate, Patna.

5.

The District Magistrate, Saran.

6.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna.

7.

The Superintendent of Police, Saran.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Brij Bihari Tiwary For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Partha Sarthi -Ga4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 06-01-2020 The petition filed on 23.08.2018 is listed for hearing for the first time today before the Court.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief: "(i) In the nature of "Mandamus" directing and commanding the respondent authorities to consider transferring of the 13 villages under three Panchayat of Danapur block to Danapur, Police Station-Danapur, District-Patna from Akilpur Police Station which now falls in the District of Saran."

Patna High Court CWJC No.16815 of 2018(2) dt.06-01-2020 2/2 After the matter was heard for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner shall be content if a direction is issued to the concerned respondents to consider and decide the representation, which the petitioner shall be making afresh within a period of four weeks from today. Learned counsel for the State states that upon receipt of such request, if any, the same shall be dealt with in accordance with law, expeditiously and positively within a period of three months from the date of receipt thereof. Equally, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to take recourse to such alternative remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law.

We are hopeful that as and when petitioner takes recourse to such remedies, as are otherwise available in law, before the appropriate forum, the same shall be dealt with, in accordance with law and with reasonable dispatch. The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) BT/- U