Birendra Chaudhari @ Balendra Chaudhari @ Bilendra Chaudhari @ Birendra Chaudhri v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65771 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2022 Thana- KADIRGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== BIRENDRA CHAUDHARI @ BALENDRA CHAUDHARI @ BILENDRA CHAUDHARI @ BIRENDRA CHAUDHRI Son of Maheshwar Chaudhari R/o vill - Agarpur, P.S. - Kadirganj, Distt. - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Lallu Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ajay Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 17-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 494, 498A, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per prosecution case, the informant was married with the petitioner in the year 2017 and it is alleged that her husband (petitioner) and her father-in-law started assaulting with lathi and danda. It is further alleged that informant has a male and female child, the petitioner not provided Rasan and has solemnized second marriage and said not live in house and used to say threatening to kill and say to flee away from house.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65771 of 2023(2) dt.17-10-2023 2/2 that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is the husband of the informant and he neither tortured the informant, nor demanded dowry from her. Petitioner is ready to keep his wife (informant) and children with full dignity and honour. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 16.06.2023.
5. The application for bail is vehemently opposed by learned APP for the State,
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st , Masaurhi, Patna in connection with Kadirganj P.S. Case No. 98 of 2022. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T