← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16898/2018disposed

Ranjesh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-04-09Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16898 of 2018 ====================================================== Ranjesh Kumar Singh S/o Lal Bahadur Singh, R/o P.O. Chunni, P.S.+BlockChhatapur, District- Supaul. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

The Principal Secretary Food Civil Supply Department Bihar, Patna. 3.

The District Magistrate, Supaul Cum Chairman of Selection Committee Supaul.

4.

The District Supply Officer, Triveniganj, Supaul. 5.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Jamui.

6.

The Block Supply Officer, Chhatapur, Supaul.

7.

Nitu Devi W/o Manoj Kumar Singh, R/o Chunni Post- Chunni BlockChhatpur Sub-Division- Triveniganj, District- Supaul. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.S.Raza Ahmed -AAG5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 09-04-2019 Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that he may be permitted to file a representation before the District Magistrate, Supaul to consider his grievance with respect to selection of respondent no. 7 for granting license in her favour for the Public Distribution Shop in Chunni Ward No. 7, Block Chhatapur, Sub-Division- Triveniganj, District- Supaul. Learned counsel for the State submits that in case the petitioner has any grievance with respect to grant of license of Public Distribution Shop to respondent no. 7, he has got remedy under the provisions of the Bihar Targeted P.D.S. Control Order,

Patna High Court CWJC No.16898 of 2018(2) dt.09-04-2019 2/2 2016.

Learned counsel for the respondent no. 7 is present and a counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent no. 7. Let it be kept on record.

In the aforesaid circumstance, this Court dispose of this writ application with liberty to the petitioner to seek his remedy before the appropriate authority in accordance with law. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/-vedU