Sachin Kumar @ Sachin Chauhan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64372 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-191 Year-2024 Thana- ROH District- Nawada ====================================================== Sachin Kumar @ Sachin Chauhan S/O Mewalal Chauhan @ Meva Lal Chauhan R/O Village - Jakhaur, Police Station - Roh, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/S
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Deepak Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Shyam Bihari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-10-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366(A)/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that his minor daughter aged about 14 years used to talk to a boy and when he came to know about the same, he scolded his daughter. Further, on 30.06.24 at 10.00 P.M., the boy namely Sandeep Kumar and petitioner came and fled with his daughter.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64372 of 2024(2) dt.17-10-2024 2/3 that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant being elder brother of Sandeep. It is also submitted that Sandeep and they eloped, the victim were in love, but then, both of them were minor. It is also submitted that the family was not even aware about the friendship of Sandeep with the victim. It is next submitted that victim came back and she has not supported the case of the prosecution and Sandeep has also been granted the privilege of bail by the learned Juvenile Justice Board. It is thus submitted at the cost of repetition that petitioner being elder brother of Sandeep came to be implicated by the informant.
5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, abovenamed, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Ms. Anita Kumari, the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64372 of 2024(2) dt.17-10-2024 3/3 Nawada in connection with Roh P. S. Case No.191 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T