Anish Kumar Chaubey v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59375 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2025 Thana- DHANSOI District- Buxar ====================================================== 1.

Anish Kumar Chaubey S/O Vidhya Bhushan Chaubey R/O VillageChaubey ke Parasiyan, P.S- Dhansoi, Distt.- Buxar. 2.

Vidhya Bhushan Chaubey S/O Late Kedar Nath Chaubey R/O VillageChaubey ke Parasiyan, P.S- Dhansoi, Distt.- Buxar. 3.

Ankit Kumar Chaubey S/O Vidhya Bhushan Chaubey R/O Village- Chaubey ke Parasiyan, P.S- Dhansoi, Distt.- Buxar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Ms. Sharda Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-09-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 303(2), 76, 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S..

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that on 22.05.2025 at about 7:30 PM, Petitioner No. 1 with Runi, Petitioner No. 2 with axe and Petitioenr No. 3 with Gadasa assaulted informant and his wife as a result of which they sustained multiple injuries.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59375 of 2025(2) dt.02-09-2025 2/2

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, Petitioner No. 2 and informant are full brothers and there is dispute between the parties with regard to partition of property and only with a view to put pressure upon these petitioners, this false and concocted case has been lodged. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners and submitted that petitioners are named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that they assaulted informant and his wife. Doctor has opined the injuries sustained by both the injured as grievous in nature.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, specific and direct nature of accusation and nature of injuries sustained by the injured, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T