Mukesh Kumar @ Mridul v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.25190 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -118 Year- 2016 Thana -TARAPUR District- MUNGER ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar @ Mridul, son of Ashok Singh, resident of Village - Mahpur, P.S. - Tarapur, District - Munger.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shastriji, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-06-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Tarapur P.S.Case No. 118 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and later on his name transpires during course of investigation. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that except confessional statement there is nothing against the petitioner and there is no recovery from the petitioner and no test identification parade was held and the co-accused, in whose confessional statement name of petitioner has come, has already been granted bail by this Court in Cr.Misc.No.4319 of 2017, vide order dated 17.3.2017 and he is in custody for about six months. Heard learned APP also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25190 of 2017 (3) dt.22-06-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Munger, in connection with Tarapur P.S.Case No. 118 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U