Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45435/2014bail granted

Tej Pratap Rao v. The State Of Bihar

2015-01-29Mr. Justice Amaresh Kumar Lal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45435 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -195 Year- 2014 Thana -BAIRIYA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== Tej Pratap Rao Son of Rajeshwar Rao Resident of Village- Laukariya, Police Station- Bairiya, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brij Kishor Mishra, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kr.Singh 1(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 29-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 385, 387 of IPC. Allegation is that a ransom of Rs.5,00,000/- was demanded from the informant and in case of non-payment, threatening was given that he would be killed. Demand was made by mobile. During investigation it was found that the mobile was of the petitioner and he has also accepted his guilt before the police.

It is submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. The mobile was lost and someone has used it. After investigation charge-sheet has already been submitted and there is

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45435 of 2014 (2) dt.29-01-2015 2/2 no apprehension of tampering with the evidence. Considering the facts and circumstances, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri Jitesh Kumar, learned Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, DistrictWest Champaran/court concerned in Bairiya P. S. Case No. 195 of 2014 with following conditions:-

1. The petitioner will not indulge himself in similar or any other offence.

2. One of the bailors must be the close relative of the petitioner.

3. The petitioner will be well represented in the Court on each and every date and in case of absence for two consecutive dates or in case of violation of terms of bail, his bail bond would be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) Kanchan/- U T