Sunil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14561 of 2025 ====================================================== Sunil Kumar Son of Bahadau Sah @ Bahadur Sah, Resident of Village- New Zafar Nagar, P.S- Sahebpur Kamal, District- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Vice Chancellor, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwarnagar, Darbhanga.

3.

The Registrar, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwarnagar, Darbhanga.

4.

The Examination Controller, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Kameshwarnagar, Darbhanga.

5.

The Principal, Ganeshdutt College, Begusarai- 851101. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Eashita Raj, Adv.

For the State :

Mr. Rajendra Singh, GA 10 Mr. Jitendra Kumar, AC to GA 10 For the LNMU :

Mr. Bindhyachal Rai, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Government Advocate (10) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 01-11-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner is a student, aggrieved with the action of the respondent authorities of the University in not issuing the marks for practical in its Statement of Marks and Grade, despite the fact he had appeared and participated in the practical examination. In support the aforesaid contention, a certificate duly issued by the Principal of the Ganeshdutt College, Begusarai to the effect that the petitioner participated in the practical examination, has also been placed on record as

Patna High Court CWJC No.14561 of 2025 dt.01-11-2025 2/2 Annexure-P/3. Time and again the petitioner represented before the Examination Controller of the Lalit Narain Mithila University but to no avail.

3. Learned Advocate for the University seeks a short adjournment to get instruction and apprise this Court with regard to the present position.

4. Having considered the limited grievance of the petitioner, instead of keeping the matter pending, this Court deems it fit and proper to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondent no. 4 to look into the matter and do the needful in the light of materials brought on record, especially Annexure-P/3 to the writ petition, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

5. The writ petition stands disposed.

(Harish Kumar, J) Anjani/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 04.11.2025 Transmission Date