Aditya Kishore Aditya v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63274 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-19 Year-2023 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Aditya Kishore Aditya, S/o Arun Kishore Arun, R/o Flat No. 401, SLD Apartment near S.B.I., P.S.- Kanker Bagh, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Neha Kumari, D/o Vijay Kumar, R/o Mohalla-Karman Tola, Ara, P.S.- Ara Nawada, Dist- Bhojpur ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vishal Saurabh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 03-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and apprehending his arrest in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No.19 of 2023 registered under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 498-A read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. Allegation against petitioner is to commit mental and physical cruelty upon informant due to non-fulfilment of demand of a four-wheeler vehicle.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63274 of 2024(7) dt.03-02-2026 2/3 petitioner that the allegation qua physical and mental cruelty is appearing very much general and omnibus against the petitioner and moreover the petitioner and informant has settled their disputes and differences in terms of Annexure-4, which is a joint compromise petition preferred before learned Family Court as to dissolve their marriage in pending case i.e. Matrimonial Case No.130 of 2024. It is submitted that the other related issues qua maintenance and custody of children also appears settled between the parties through Annexure-4 and, as such, there is not dispute and differences existing between the parties for the present.
5. Heard learned APP.
6. Despite of service of notice, none turned up to join the present proceeding on behalf of O.P. No.2.
7. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by taking note of Annexure-4 as pointed out by learned counsel appearing for petitioner prima facie it appears that the parties have settled their issues and differences, accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63274 of 2024(7) dt.03-02-2026 3/3 from today, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Ara, Bhojpur in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No.19 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short 'CrPC')/under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (in short 'BNSS').
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.) Sanjeet/- U T