Patna High CourtCR. MISC./27166/2017bail granted

Rupesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-12Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.27166 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -82 Year- 2017 Thana -CHAUTHAM District- KHAGARIA ======================================================

1. Rupesh Kumar Son of Kailu Singh, Resident of Village- Devka, P.S.- Chautham, District- Khagaria.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anish Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-07-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Chautham P.S. Case No. 82 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 20 of NDPS Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of 150 grams of Ganja.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case. Moreover, he has sufficiently been punished for the said offence as he has been in judicial custody since 29.04.2017 and has no criminal antecedent and is ready to abide by any condition imposed on him for grant of bail.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation and the period of custody and also petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as such, let

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27166 of 2017 (2) dt.12-07-2017 2/2 the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge - cum- Special Judge, Khagaria, in connection with Chautham P.S. Case No. 82 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T