← Library
Patna High CourtL.P.A/2066/2015disposed

Birendra Kumar Singh v. The Veer Kumar Singh University Arrah And ORS

2019-05-08Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran,Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.2066 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2228 of 2014 ====================================================== Birendra Kumar Singh Son of late Jagdish Prasad Singh Resident Of VillageDharam Pipra, P.O.- Kakila, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- Bhojpur ... ... Appellant

Versus

1.

The Veer Kumar Singh University Arrah, Bhojpur through its Registrar 2.

The Vice Chancellor, Veer Kunwar Singh Univesity, Arrah, Bhojpur 3.

The University Representative-Cum Inspector Of College, Veer Kunwar Singh University, Arrah, Bhojpur 4.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Jagdishpur, District- Bhojpur Cum In-Charge Secretary Of Ad-Hoc Committee, Sant Sri Barhana Mahila College, Jagdishpur, District Bhojpur 5.

Sri Dineshwar Prasad Singh, Sant Sri Barhana Mahila College, Jagdishpur District Bhojpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Madan Jeet Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sarva Deo Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN) 08-05-2019 We have already heard the parties and we have already noted that the change over which was questioned by the petitioner has again undergone change and the private respondent presently stands replaced by a third person whose appointment is not in question. Another development which has taken place is that the Ad-hoc Body is now replaced by a regular Governing Body.

These subsequent developments which were not

Patna High Court L.P.A No.2066 of 2015(16) dt.08-05-2019 2/2 available at the stage of the writ petition nonetheless renders the issue academic and in such view of the matter, we dispose of the appeal with the liberty to the petitioner that in case he is so aggrieved he may take recourse to such remedy as may be available to him to question fresh appointment in accordance with law.

(Jyoti Saran, J) ( Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Surendra/- U