Monu Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.1945 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -577 Year- 2016 Thana -SAHARSA District- SAHARSA ======================================================
1. Monu Singh, Son of Ranjeet Kumar Singh, Resident of Sant Nagar, Hanuman Chowk, Gangjala, Ward No. 15, P.S. Saharsa Sadar, District - Saharsa .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Smt. Ranjana Pathak For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Akhileshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-03-2017 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 577 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 384, 307, 448 and 34 Indian Penal Code.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that only general and omnibus allegation of assault has been levelled against the petitioner and that too is not true as the petitioner happens to be the person, who came to spot to pacify the matter for which he has been made accused in this case. Moreover, the injuries caused to the informant from the said assault, was found to be simple in nature.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of offence and also that the injuries caused to the persons of the informant was found to be simple in nature and also considering the fact that the petitioner
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1945 of 2017 (4) dt.16-03-2017 2/2 ahs no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Saharsa in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 577 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U