Ram Lali Devi v. The State Of Bihar Mr. R.K.Mahajan Through The Principal Secretary Human Resource Development Depart
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3213 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5396 of 2015 ====================================================== Ram Lali Devi Wife of Late Madan Mohan, resident of Village- Rajuaa, Bakhari, Police Station- Mahsi in the District of East Champaran, Motihari. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar Mr. R. K. Mahajan, through the Principal Secretary, Human Resource Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. Mr. P. K. Singh, son of not known to the petitioner, the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.
3. Mr. Atul Prasad, son of not known to the petitioner, the Commissioner, Tirhut Commissionery, Muzaffarpur, Bihar.
4. Mr. Vijay Kr. Pandey, son of not known to the petitioner, the Director, Higher Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna.
5. Mr. Ravi Verma, son of not known to the petitioner, the district Education Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur.
.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. GA12 Ajay ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 10-01-2018 In the matter of grant of Selection Grade to petitioner's husband, the learned Writ Court directed the respondents to examine the claim and take a decision. From the show cause filed by the respondents and the orders passed vide Annexures A and B, it is seen that the claim has been examined and, for reasons indicated therein, the claim has been decided by holding that the petitioner's husband is not entitled for Selection Grade.
Patna High Court MJC No.3213 of 2015 (3) dt.10-01-2018 2/2 Once consideration has been done and claim has been rejected, as is evident from Annexures A and B filed along with the show cause, no further indulgence is called for in the present proceedings.
In case the petitioner has any grievance still subsisting, with regard to the manner in which the claim has been considered and decided, it gives a fresh cause of action to the petitioner to claim afresh in accordance with law in an appropriate proceeding.
With the aforesaid, this application is disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) K.C.jha/- U