Patna High CourtCWJC/20231/2014dismissed

Naresh Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-06-26Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20231 of 2014 =========================================================== Naresh Prasad son of Late Kali Sao, resident of Mohalla- Sonar Patti, P.S. Nawada Town, District- Nawada .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The Director, Secondary Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

4. The District Magistrate, Nawada

5. The Additional District Magistrate, Nawada

6. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Nawada

7. The District Education Officer, Nawada

8. The District Programe Officer, Nawada

9. The Principal, Project Girls Inter School, Govindpur, District- Nawada

10. Anita Kumari, wife of Bharat Bhushan, resident of Village AND P.O.- Govindpur, P.S. Govindpur, District- Nawada, at present working as Assistant Teacher, Project Girls Inter School, Govindpur, Nawada

11. Smt. Sushila Devi, wife of Late Parmeshwar Singh, resident of VillageGovindpur, P.S. Govindpur, District- Nawada, at present posted as Peon, Project Girls Inter School, Govindpur, Nawada

12. Suraj Prasad Sao, son of Late Kishun Sao, resident of Village- Govindpur, P.S.- Govindpur, District- Nawada .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Naresh Prasad For the Respondent/s : Mr. GA4- ASHOK PRIYADARSHI =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 26-06-2015 *************** 26.06.2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner has already set the law in motion in one to many forums. No further confusion is required to be add up by the High Court by passing any kind of

Patna High Court CWJC No.20231 of 2014 dt.26-06-2015 2/2 order for many a reason, including the fact that those proceeding will get prejudiced because of any observation of the High Court.

Writ application stands dismissed, accordingly.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) SKM/- U