Patna High CourtL.P.A/631/2015dismissed

Mister Choudhry v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-07-10The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.631 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1633 of 2014 ====================================================== Mister Choudhry Son of Bithal Chaudhary, Resident of Village: Shivpur, P.O. ; Kharari, P.S. Nokha, District: Rohtaus. .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Commissioner-Cum- Secretary, Department of Human Resources and Development, Bihar, Patna.

3. Director , Department of Human Resources and Development Bihar, Patna.

4. Deputy Director of Human Resources and Development Department, Bihar, Patna.

5. District Magistrate, Rohtas, Sasaram.

6. Deputy District Collector, Sasaram, Rohtas.

7. District Education Officer, Rohtas, Sasaram .

8. District Programme Officer, Rohtas, Sasaram.

9. Chairman, Zila Parishad Cum Chairman, Selection Committee, Sasaram, Rohtas.

10. Abhishek Kumar Son of Shashibhushan Prasad, Village - Nokha, Ward No. 2, Sasaram Rohtas.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sc2- Nawal Kishore Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 10-07-2017 In the mater of appointment to the post in question on contract basis when the petitioner and the private respondents received equal marks, weightage to the qualification acquired in the intermediate examination was given to the private respondent. The learned writ court has approved the aforesaid policy followed

Patna High Court LPA No.631 of 2015 (3) dt.10-07-2017 2/2 for selecting the candidates when two candidates had identical marks. The approach adopted by the learned writ court is quite right and hence, we do not find any reason to make indulgence in the matter.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U