Sanjay Sahani v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60087 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2000 Thana- SIWAIPATTI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Sanjay Sahani Son of Late Munilal Sahni Resident of Village - Bara Bharti, P.S.- Minapur, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Dilip Kumar Roy For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Renu Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 22-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
The petitioner is in custody since 24.12.2018 registered for the offences punishable under sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had gone to outside the State of Bihar for earning his livelihood, hence his pairvi could not be made properly on his behalf and his bail bond was cancelled.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 8th Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur in connection with Sessions Trial
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60087 of 2019(5) dt.22-01-2020 2/2 No.262 of 2001 arising out of Sibai Patti P.S.Case No.08 of 2000 with following conditions:-
(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or his wife.
(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.
(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) B.Kr./- U T