← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./71634/2021bail rejected

Mohammad Sah Alam v. The State Of Bihar

2022-07-20Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71634 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-233 Year-2021 Thana- KOCHADHAMAN District- Kishanganj ====================================================== MOHAMMAD SAH ALAM Son of Mohammad Hanif @ Hanif Resident of Village - Nagar Parishad, Ward no.9, P.S.- Kishanganj, Distt.- Kiahsanganj, At Present R/o village - Chopra, P.S.- Chopra, Distt.- Uttar Dinajpur (W.B). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Meena Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 20-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a), 32, 41 and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. It is a case of recovery of foreign liquor from the Ambulance owned by this petitioner.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner has got clean antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State opposed the anticipatory bail.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71634 of 2021(2) dt.20-07-2022 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances that the seized liquor was recovered from the vehicle of this petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T