Md. Jalauddin @ Shiekh Jalauddin v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59312 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-82 Year-2019 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE - BIRPUR DistrictSupaul ====================================================== 1.

Md. Jalauddin @ Shiekh Jalauddin S/o Late Osbal R/o Village- Lalpur Goth, P.S.- Bhimpur, District- Supaul 2.

Navi Hussain S/o Late Gul Mohammad R/o Village- Lalpur Goth, P.S.- Bhimpur, District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Md. Hasbul S/o Rahman R/o Village- Lalpur Goth, P.S.- Bhirpur, DistrictSupaul ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Md Harun Quareshi, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-09-2025 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application with regard to petitioner no. 2 as he has already been arrested during pendency of the case.

2. Permission is granted.

3. This anticipatory bail application with regard to above named petitioner no. 2 is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.

4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

5. Petitioner no. 1 apprehends arrest in a case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59312 of 2025(3) dt.15-09-2025 2/3 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 323, 341, 506, 147 of the Indian Penal Code.

6. Complainant alleged that six accused persons including this petitioner, under conspiracy, prepared a forged sale deed of agricultural land of the complainant in their favour and obtained mutation of the same. It is further alleged that on 05.03.2019, the accused persons tried to forcibly occupy the said land and dispossess the complainant.

7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner is neither seller nor purchaser of the land in question rather he is only identifier and witness of the aforesaid sale deed. Petitioner is not a beneficiary and claims clean antecedent.

8. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.

9. Considering the backdrop of the case, nature of accusation and clean antecedent, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner no. 1 in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59312 of 2025(3) dt.15-09-2025 3/3 Chief Judicial Magistrate, Birpur in connection with Complaint Case No. 82C of 2019, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T