← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3430/2019dismissed

M/S Dhanpat Kumar Jain v. The State Of Bihar

2022-07-26Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3430 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11845 of 2005 ====================================================== M/s Dhanpat Kumar Jain A Proprietorship Firm, Having its Office at Mill road, P.O., P.S. and Dist- Khagaria, through its Proprietor Shri Dhanpat Kumar Jain, aged about 56 Years (Male), Son of Sri Sampat Mal Jain, Resident of Mill Road, P.O., P.S. and District- Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Department of rural Development, Bihar, Patna through Mr. Vinay Kumar, its Commissioner-cum-Secretary. 2.

Mr. Vinay Kumar The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of rural Development, Bihar, Patna.

3.

Mr. Yogeshwar Pandey The Engineer in chief- cum- Additional Commissioner-cum- Special Secretary, Rural Engineering Organization, Department of Rural Development, Bihar, Patna. 4.

Mr. Md. Khaliphur Zama The Superintending Engineer, Rural Engineering organization, Saharsa.

5.

Mr. Gyan Bibhakar The Executive Engineer, Rural Engineering Organization, Works Division, Khagaria.

6.

Mr. Naresh Kumar Yadav The Assistant Engineer, Rural Engineering Organization, Works Sub Division, Maheshkhunt, Khagaria. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Parties :

Mr. Anjani Kumar (AAG 4) Mr. Sanjay Prasad, AC to AAG 4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-07-2022 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed for initiation of a contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for violation of the order dated 04.08.2011 passed in CWJC No.11845 of 2005. Pursuant to the order dated 04.08.2011 passed in CWJC No.11845 of 2005, the order has been passed by the

Patna High Court MJC No.3430 of 2019(3) dt.26-07-2022 2/2 authority. If so advised, the petitioner may challenge the order of the authority in writ jurisdiction.

In the circumstances, this application is dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) BT/- U