Shagufta Sarfaraz v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20996 of 2021 ====================================================== Shagufta Sarfaraz Wife of Sarfaraz Alam, residetn of Ward no. 11 Village - Bairiya, P.S. Kesariya, District - East Champaran, Motihari. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Deputy Director of Police, Champaran Range, Bettia, West Champaran. 4.

The Superintendent of Police, East Champaran, Motihari. 5.

The Officer-in - Charge of Kesariya Police Station District - East Champaran.

6.

Abhay Rai, S.I. of Police Kesariya Police Station, District - East Champaran. 7.

Kalim Khan, S.I. of Police Kesariya Police Station, District - East Champaran.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Anisur Rahman, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Manish Kumar (GP-4) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 07-12-2022 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1.(A) For issuance of appropriate writ/order or direction Commanding the respondent no.1 to 4 to initiate an inquiry against the respondent no. 5 to 7 for their wrong and illegal activities in favour of a particular candidate Kumari Archi a relative of the respondent no. 5 in the election of Mukhiya in Gram Panchayat Bairiya P.S. Kesariya District East Champaran in the Panchayat election 2021 as they are responsible for defeat of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.20996 of 2021(2) dt.07-12-2022 2/2 petitioner in the said election and also to take necessary action against the respondent no. 5 to 7 for their guilt in view of the direction issued by the state Election commission Bihar, Patna and also for removal of the respondent no. 5 to 7 from Kesariya police station as the people of the area in sufficiently been tortured and harassed by the wrong and illegal activities and terror created by the respondent no. 5 to 7 only for wrongful gain."

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law. Liberty so sought is granted.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/Saurav U