← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./70595/2024bail granted

Manoranjan Kumar @ Manoj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-15Justice Smt. Soni Shrivastava3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70595 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-107 Year-2023 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== Manoranjan Kumar @ Manoj Kumar S/o Ramjas Prasad R/o VillageSamsara, Sadhishopur, P.S- Bihta, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Tanu Kumari W/o Manoranjan Kumar @ Manoj Kumar, D/o Late Binay Kumar Sinha R/o Mohalla - Bahri Begumpur, Sat Chora, P.s. - Byepas, Distt. - Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rashid Zafar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Anzarul Haque Sahara ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 15-05-2025 The petitioner and the opposite party no. 2 are present along with their respective counsels. After a brief interaction, it appears that the matter cannot be resolved finally at this stage.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. .

3. The prosecution case is based upon a complaint filed by the opposite party no. 2 in which she has made an allegation of demand of dowry and torture. Petitioner is the husband of opposite party no.2.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations levelled in the complaint are not correct and as a

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70595 of 2024(5) dt.15-05-2025 2/3 matter of fact, the petitioner has always been ready to keep the opposite party no.2 with full dignity and honour and the petitioner who is present physically also supports the same.

5. However, the opposite party no. 2 has serious complaints with regard to the conduct of the petitioner and hence, she is not agreeable on going back to her matrimonial house.

6. At this stage, the petitioner offers to give Rs.4000/- (rupees four thousand) per month to opposite party no.2 in the first week of every month. It goes without saying that the aforesaid payment shall be subject to any order passed in matrimonial maintenance case or any other collateral proceeding.

7. In such view of the matter, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Complaint Case No. 107 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S., and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70595 of 2024(5) dt.15-05-2025 3/3 subject to the further condition that the petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation/trial.

8. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2, under instruction, submits that the opposite party no.2 undertakes to provide her bank account details to the petitioner within a period of two weeks from today. If the opposite party no.2 furnishes the bank account in which the amount can be transferred, and yet the petitioner fails to give the aforesaid amount on two consecutive dates to opposite party no.2, the opposite party no.2 would be at liberty to file cancellation of bail.

9. Accordingly, this application stands disposed of. (Soni Shrivastava, J) devendra/- U T