Pushpa Sinha @ Pushpa Devi And ORS. v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Revision No. 857 of 2015 ===================================================

1. Pushpa Sinha @ Pushpa Devi, Wife of Nirvay Prasad Verma.

2. Asha Sinha @ Asha Devi, W/o Manoj Kumar Sinha.

3. Sautan Mini Devi, W/o Ajit Kumar Sinha. All are resident of Village-Lal Atimi, P.S.-Nasariganj, District-Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Anju Devi, D/o-Devendra Prasad Verma, Resident of Malaypur, P.S.-Lasmipur, District-Jamui.

At present residing with her husband-Ajit Kumar Sinha, Resident of Village-Lal Atimi, P.S.-Nasariganj, District-Rohtas. .... .... Respondent/s =================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Nandan Sahay, Adv. For the Respondent/s: Mr. Ram Chandra Singh (APP) =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 02.

09.11.2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the State.

The Petitioners seek revision of the order dated 12.08.2015 passed by the Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram vide Cr. Misc. No. 159 of 2015 in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 15 of 2014, by which he has refused to extend the time of surrender of the Petitioners. Considering the grounds mentioned in the petition, let the Petitioners, above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.857 of 2015 (2) dt.09-11-2015 fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram vide Cr. Misc. No. 159 of 2015 in connection with Mahila P. S. Case No. 15 of 2014 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioners. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioners.

(ii) That the Petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iii) That the Petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Accordingly, the Revision Application is allowed and the order dated 12.08.2015 passed by the Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram vide Cr. Misc. No. 159 of 2015 in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 15 of 2014 is, hereby, set aside.

Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.) U T