← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./60112/2025allowed

Pardeshi Kumar @ Pradesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-17Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60112 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-232 Year-2025 Thana- DORIGANJ District- Saran ====================================================== Pardeshi Kumar @ Pradesh Kumar, Son of Pujan Rai, R/o Purbi Balua, P.S. - Doriganj, District - Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjit Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 17-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, on secret information police conducted raid at the place of occurrence which is a karkatnuma hut of petitioner. On search, total 10 litres of country made liquor, 400 kilogram jaggery and 10 kg of Naushadar were recovered. It is alleged that the petitioner fled away from the place of occurrence.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case on the basis of suspicion. He further submits that petitioner was not present on the spot and he has no concern with the place

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60112 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 2/2 of occurrence. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Charge-sheet has already been submitted after completion of investigation and there is no chance of absconding the petitioner or tampering with the prosecution evidence. The petitioner is in jail custody since 13.07.2025. He has no criminal antecedent. He undertakes to cooperate in trial.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No. 3, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Doriganj P.S. Case No. 232 of 2025.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) khushbu/- U T