Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23189/2017bail granted

Ram Babu v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-05Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23189 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -179 Year- 2017 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictSITAMARHI ======================================================

1. Ram Babu, son of Tala Mahto @ Shiv Tahal Mahto, resident of VillageRashulpur, P.S.- Mejarganj, District- Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-07-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with C2-179 of 2017registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(A) of Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016.

Allegation against the petitioner is about recovery of 16 and odd ltrs. of nepali wine.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 13.3.2017. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23189 of 2017 (3) dt.05-07-2017 2/2 Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Sitamarhi in connection with C2-179 of 2017.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U