Gorakh Chaudhur v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.23150 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -164 Year- 2016 Thana -SHEOHAR District- SHEOHAR ======================================================
1. Gorakh Chaudhur Son of Ramakant Chaudhur @ Ramakant Chaudhri Resident of Village- Malipokhar, Bhinda Police Station- Sheohar in the district of Sheohar.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nagendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 342, 323, 324, 326 and 427/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Later on Sections 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added in connection with Sheohar P.S. Case No. 164/2016.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that no specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioner. Specific allegation of assault is against one Bhola Chaudhur and the injuries found on the injured are simple in nature. Further, the petitioner is in custody since 20.12.2016.
Learned Additional Public Prosecutor could not
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23150 of 2017 (4) dt.04-07-2017 2/2 controvert the above facts and submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation.
Having heard both sides, in view of the facts, stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheohar in connection with Sheohar P.S. Case No. 164/2016, subject to conditions that one of the bailors should be relative of the petitioner and another having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court below with further condition that he will co-operate in disposal of the trial and will make himself available before the court and failure to appear on two consecutive dates without any appropriate reason will be liable for cancellation of his bail. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J.) Rakhi U T