Raja @ Md. Sajjak @ Sajjak v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.1265 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -209 Year- 2016 Thana -NARPATGANJ District- ARRARIA ====================================================== Raja @ Md. Sajjak @ Sajjak, S/o Md. Razzaque, Resident of Village Mehdipur, P.S. Chhatapur District Supaul.

.... .... Appellant

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Respondent ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Smt Usha Kumari No-1, Special P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Special P.P.

This appeal has been filed for setting aside the order the order dated 8.2.2017 passed in bail petition filed by the appellant by Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Araria, arising out of Sessions Trial No. 41 of 2017/Trial No. 05 of 2017/ Narpatganj P.S.Case No. 209 of 2016 registered for the offences under Sections 406, 420, 376, 354/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3(1)(iii) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and for grant of bail to the appellant.

Allegation against the appellant as per FIR is that he induced the informant for providing job and brought her with him

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1265 of 2017 (4) dt.04-07-2017 2/2 and taken the informant to Nepal where he has committed rape upon her. FIR further shows that appellant again came and asked her to go to Purnea and there was hulla and his motorcycle was seized by the villagers.

It has been submitted on behalf of the appellant that he has falsely been implicated in this case and the whole prosecution story is false and concocted as FIR shows nothing about commission of rape and he is in custody since 17.10.2016. Learned Special P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail. Having heard both sides and considering the facts and circumstances, the appeal is dismissed.

As the appellant is in custody, learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the appellant and try to conclude it within nine months.

With the above observation, this appeal is disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U