Siddarth Kumar @ Siddharth Kumar @ Sidharth Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67033 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-233 Year-2022 Thana- BALIYA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Siddarth Kumar @ Siddharth Kumar @ Sidharth Kumar Son Of Bam Bahadur Yadav Residnet Of Village- Tulsi Tol, Paharpur, Ps -BALIA, DisttBegusarai ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr.Hare Krishna Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sharma, APP Mr. Randhir Kumar Verma, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and the opposite party no.2.
2. The petitioner, who is husband of opposite party no.2, apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 494/498A/504 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. Mediator's report dated 29.4.2024 reveals that in spite of efforts, dispute between the parties could not be resolved through process of mediation. However, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner offers and undertakes that he is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 5000/-per month, starting from this month to the opposite party no.2.
4. In view of the undertaking of learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 5000/- per month, provisional bail allowed to the petitioner vide order dated 19.10.2023 is confirmed on the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67033 of 2023(5) dt.06-05-2024 2/2 following conditions:- (i) Opposite party no.2. would file an affidavit before the court below and bring on record her saving bank account number for its communication to the petitioner. (ii) Petitioner would deposit the aforesaid maintenance amount per month in the saving bank account of the opposite party no.2.
(iii) In case, the petitioner fails to deposit the maintenance amount for two consecutive months, the court below would be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond. (iv) The aforementioned payment will be subject to any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceedings. The present order, in no way, will preclude the parties to resolve the issue otherwise.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T