Manoj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31641 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -517 Year- 2016 Thana -DHANARUA District- PATNA ====================================================== Manoj Yadav, son of Late Satish Gop, Resident of Village - Nanauri, P.S. - Dhanarua, District - Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Chandrasen Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-07-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Dhanarua P.S. Case No. 517 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 324, 332, 353, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1b)a, 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has not been named in the F.I.R, his name transpired in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused and except that there is nothing against him. It has further been submitted that no recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner and he has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 22.03.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the facts as stated above, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31641 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017 2/2 furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Masaurhi, Patna, in connection with Dhanarua P.S. Case No. 517 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T