Vicky Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59512 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2025 Thana- Nagara District- Saran ====================================================== Vicky Kumar S/O Jiut Ram R/O Village- Affaur Purab Tola, P.S - Nagra, District - Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Hemant Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(2), 109, 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S..

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, assaulted father of informant with sickle due to which he died.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. The deceased is none else than own uncle of this petitioner and only on account of land dispute, petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Moreover, charge-sheet has already been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59512 of 2025(3) dt.07-11-2025 2/2 submitted and petitioner is in custody since 05.05.2025.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that he, along two other accused persons, assaulted father of informant with sickle due to which he died. The post mortem report corroborates the prosecution case. Petitioner has got one criminal antecedent.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, gravity of offence, materials that have surfaced during course of investigation and criminal antecedent of the petitioner, the prayer for grant bail of to the petitioner is rejected.

7. However, considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 05.05.2025, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within a period of one year from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T