Ladla Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.1990 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -28 Year- 2016 Thana -SC/ST District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Ladla Ansari, son of Muktar Mian, resident of Village- Aliganj, P.S.- Chandradeep Dist.- Jamui.

.... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Prakash Mahto For the Respondent/s : Mr. Smt Usha Kumari No-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-08-2017 Heard the parties.

The appellant seeks regular bail in connection with Jamui S.C./S.T. Case No.28 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i)(x)(I)(vii) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Act) Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of firing on the informant but it appears that no injury has been caused. Submission of the learned counsel for the appellant is that he has been falsely implicated in this case. He is in custody for about 2 1⁄2 months. He has clean antecedent. Heard learned Special P.P. also.

Having heard both sides in view of the above facts

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1990 of 2017 (2) dt.08-08-2017 2/2 and circumstances, this appeal is allowed.

Let the appellant above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000 (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.D.J. Ist (Special Judge) in connection with S.C./S.T. Case No.28 of 2016 after setting aside order dated 27.5.2017 passed by the learned A.D.J. Ist (Special Judge), Jamui in S.C./S.T. Case No.28 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the appellant shall be local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The appellant will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. He will not make any threat to the informant or his family members. (iii) The appellant shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court concerned and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T