Ramesh Das v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71537 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-126 Year-2019 Thana- SATHI District- West Champaran ====================================================== RAMESH DAS Son of Jalandhar Das Resident of Village - Baudh Toal, Lachhnawta, P.S. Sathi, District - West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Lokesh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anand Mohan Prasad Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 22-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner has renewed his prayer for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 363 and 366A of the Indian Penal Code.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the earlier application for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 12.07.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 40912 of 2020.
The allegation against the petitioner is of having kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant, the allegations having been supported by the victim in her statement under section 164 Cr.P.C.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 14.11.2019 and there is no
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71537 of 2021(5) dt.22-06-2022 2/2 chance of the trial concluding in the near future. The only witness examined has been declared hostile. The petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the trial.
Heard learned APP for the State.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioner and the same having been supported by the minor victim in her statement under section 164 Cr.P.C, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after six months or on examination of the victim daughter of the informant, whichever is earlier. (Partha Sarthy, J) Spd/- U T