Umesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31090 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -13 Year- 2015 Thana -CHANDMUNDI District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Umesh Yadav S/o Ram Kishore Yadav Resident of Parsama, P.S.- Konch, District- Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Babu For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ashok Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-07-2017 This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Chandramandih P.S. Case No. 13 of 2015 registered for the offence(s) under section(s) 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. It appears that his name transpired on the confessional statement of co-accused. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that except confessional statement of co-accused, there is nothing against the petitioner and he was not put on TIP and he has clean antecedent and is in custody 10.04.2017. Further submission is that one of the co-accused, having similar allegation, has already been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 13.10.2015 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 28132 of 2015.

Heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor also. Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31090 of 2017 (3) dt.19-07-2017 2/2 circumstances as stated above, this application is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be enlarge on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 2nd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui .in connection with Chandramandih P.S. Case No. 13 of 2015, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine rhyme or reasons, the prosecution will have liberty to move for cancellation of his bail.

Mahesh/- (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) U T