Ram Parikha Singh @ Parikha Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.32037 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -40 Year- 2017 Thana -KUDRA District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ======================================================
1. Ram Parikha Singh @ Parikha Singh
2. Lal Mohan Singh Both are sons of Dhunur Singh, resident of village-Miriya, P.S.-Sonhan, District-Kaimur.
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kanhaiya Kishore, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 13-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
2. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Kudra P.S. Case No. 40 of 2017 registered for the offences under Sections 27-A, 20(b)(ii)(a) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act and Section 30(a) and 38(1)(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, the petitioners have filed the present application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of pre-arrest bail.
3. In view of the provisions prescribed under sub-
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32037 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017 2 / 2 section (2) of Section 76 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (for short 'the Act') as also in view of the order dated 07.07.2017 passed by this Court in the matter of Ashok Sahani Vs. State of Bihar (Cr. Misc. No. 26109 of 2017), I am of the considered opinion that an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 would not be maintainable in any case involving the arrest of any person on accusation of offence committed under 'the Act'.
4. Hence, the present application filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of prearrest bail to the petitioners in a case involving accusation of offence committed under 'the Act' is disposed of as not maintainable.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Sanjeet/- U T