Vikash Kumar Singh @ Vikash Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67318 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-336 Year-2022 Thana- HALSI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Vikash Kumar Singh @ Vikash Singh Son of Ganauri Singh Resident of Village- Chaurahi, PS -Halshi, District- Lakhisarai, State- Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mayank Raj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 02-12-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Halshi P.S. Case No.336 of 2022, registered for the offence punishable u/s 307, 341, 323, 324, 379/34 of IPC. 3.

Allegedly, petitioner along with other co-accused persons assaulted the informant with khanti, iron rod etc. When informant's brother came to save the informant, he was also assaulted by the accused persons.

4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to suspicion. It is also submitted that parties are agnates, there is admitted land dispute between the parties and there is case and counter case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67318 of 2024(2) dt.02-12-2024 2/2 between them. It is pertinent to mention that the dispute was arisen due to electricity connection but not a single wire was recovered from the place of occurrence. It is further submitted that parties are co-villagers and there was delay of 24 hours in lodging the FIR without any proper reason. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail by submitting that the injury was found grievous in nature. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the nature of injury, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected.

7.

This application is accordingly dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) priyanka/- U T