M/S Mahalaxmi Construction Through Its Proprietor Sri Rajiv Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CIVIL REVISION No.282 of 2016 ====================================================== M/s Mahalaxmi Construction through its Proprietor Sri Rajiv Ranjan Kumar, aged about 40 years, Son of Sri Vidya Sagar Singh, Resident of Mohalla - Saheb Colony, Gourakshni P.O. - Sasaram, P.S.- Town Thana, Sasaram, District- Rohtas, Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Vishesvaraya Bhawan, Patna. 2.
The Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar Vishesvaraya Bhawan Patna.
3.
The Engineer-in-Chief - I, Rural Works Department Government of Bihar, Vishesvaraya Bhawan, Patna.
4.
The Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Department, Sasaram Circle, Near Old Railway Gumti (Fatak), Takiya, Sasaram, Rohtas. 5.
The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division - II Gourakshani, Sasaram, Rohtas.
6.
The Assistant Engineer, Rural Works Department Works Division - II, Gourakshani, Sasaram, Rohtas.
7.
The Junior Engineer, Rural Works Department Work Division- II, Gourakshani, Sasaram, Rohtas.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Manish Kumar, AC to Ex. AAG 6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 05-02-2026 On previous several dates, either nobody is appearing on behalf of the petitioner or taking regular adjournments and today also on repeated calls, nobody appears on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. On perusal of the records, it appears that this Civil Revision is of the year 2016 and the petitioner is absented for last several dates and taking regular adjournments and even
Patna High Court C.R. No.282 of 2016(13) dt.05-02-2026 2/2 today, on repeated calls, nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner, so in this circumstances, this Civil Revision is dismissed for default.
(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Anand Kr.
U