← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./60675/2025bail granted

Manish Kumar @ Rohit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-10Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60675 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-186 Year-2025 Thana- DIGHA District- Patna ====================================================== Manish Kumar @ Rohit Kumar S/O Toni Sardar @ Kishod Ray @ Nandkishor Yadav Resident of Mohalla- Patthar Gali, Police Station- Digha, District-Patna (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Supriya Rani, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025 Heard Ms Supriya Rani, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Digha P.S. Case No. 186 of 2025 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 324(4), 352, 351(2) of the BNS.

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the petitioner along with other co-accused assaulted the informant and his family members while they were returning from a party with an intention to kill.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60675 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 2/3 been implicated in the present case. The petitioner is a student and no such incidence has occurred. The injury sustained by the informant and his own family member is simple in nature. The petitioner has clean antecedent. On these grounds, the petitioner seeks to be released on pre-arrest bail.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

6. Having considered the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, the fact that injury sustained by the informant and his own family member is simple in nature, the petitioner is having clean antecedent, I am of the opinion that petitioner has, prima facie, made out a case to be released on pre-arrest bail.

7. The petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate - IX, Patna/successor court in connection with Digha P.S. Case No. 186 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60675 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 3/3

8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner is involved in some other cases, as what has been stated in paragraph No.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force. (Purnendu Singh, J) Ashishsingh/- U T