Jangli Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.25431 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -647 Year- 2016 Thana -BHAGALPUR KOTWALI DistrictBHAGALPUR ======================================================

1. Jangli Sah Son of Naresh Sah Resident of Village-Piparpanti P.S. Lalmatiya (Nathnagar) District Bhagalpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Davendra Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ahmad Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-07-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kotwali (Adampur) P.S. Case No. 647 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Section 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation is of recovery of country made pistol. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that another case has been lodged in which the petitioner has been granted bail by this Court. It has further been submitted that as a matter of fact that as the petitioner has made complaint against the police official, he has been made accused in this case and has been remanded in other cases also, which will appear from Annexure -2 of this petition. Further he has been in custody since 25.11.2016. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25431 of 2017 (3) dt.05-07-2017 2/2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Bhagalpur, in connection with Kotwali (Adampur) P.S. Case No. 647 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

It is also made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of such offence, in future, his bail bonds will be cancelled.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T