Jai Kumar @ Bablu v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47578 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -2083 Year- 2013 Thana -VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictVAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Jai Kumar @ Bablu, S/O Chandeshwar Rai, Resident of village- Maganpur, P.S. Bhagwanpur, District- Vaishali.

.... .... Petitioner.

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Jyoti Kumari, D/O Mahendra Rai, W/O Jai Kumar resident of villageMaganpur, P.S. Bhagwanpur, District- Vaishali at present D/O Mahendra Rai, resident of village- Dighi, P.S. Sadar, Hajipur DistrictVaishali. .... .... Opposite Parties.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr.

For the Opposite Parties : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER --------------- 23-04-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.2083 of 2013 (Tr. No.3229 of 2014) registered under Sections 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code besides Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

The allegation against the petitioner, who is the husband of the complainant (opposite party no.2), and the other co-accused, named in the complaint petition, is of torturing, assaulting and ousting the complainant from the house for non fulfillment of dowry demand. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47578 of 2014 (2) dt.23-04-2015 2/2 that the petitioner is the husband of the complainant (opposite party no.2) and is ready to keep the complainant (opposite party no.2) with full honour and dignity.

Having considered the facts and the circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender by him within four weeks, be enlarged on provisional anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur, Vaishali, in connection with Complaint Case No.2083 of 2013 (Tr. No.3229 of 2014), subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Learned trial court is directed to issue notice to the complainant (opposite party no.2) and make attempt to resolve the dispute in between the petitioner and the complainant (opposite party no.2) by taking all possible efforts and if the dispute is resolved then confirm the provisional bail of the petitioner. If the dispute is not resolved then the trial court will pass the order on its own merit. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U T