← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/2250/2018disposed

Sakindra Kumar @ Sikandra Rai v. The State Of Bihar Through Its Chief Secretary Old Secretariat, Patna And ORS

2018-09-26Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2250 of 2018 Arising out of Excise Case No. 452 of 2017 (PR No. 14/17-18), District Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Sakindra Kumar @ Sikandra Rai S/o Kishori Ray, R/o Village- Morsandi, P.S.- Motipur , District- Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary Old Secretariat, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Excise, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Principal Secretary Home Police, Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Collector, Muzaffarpur District Muzaffarpur.

5. The Superintendent of Police Excise Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur.

6. Sub Inspector Excise, Motipur Circle , District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nitu Kumari, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kumar Manish (SC-5) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 26-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner is seeking provisional release of the vehicle H.F. Deluxe Motorcycle bearing Reg.No.BR06BB-2108, which has been seized in connection with Excise Case No.452/17 (PR No.14/17-18), Muzaffarpur, registered for the offence under Sections 30(a)/38 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for recovery of 9 liters illicit liquor from the vehicle in question. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by the terms and conditions which may be imposed by this Court for provisional release of the

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.2250 of 2018 (2) dt.26-09-2018 2/2 vehicle in question.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no confiscation proceeding has been initiated.

In view of the views expressed by the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court, considering the quantity of the illicit liquor being less than 30 liters, this Court would direct release of the vehicle in question on petitioner furnishing two sureties for the value of the vehicle in question as indicated in the insurance document to the satisfaction of the court below. Apart from the above, the petitioner shall be obliged to submit an undertaking before the learned court below that during the pendency of the confiscation proceeding he would not deal with the vehicle in question and shall not create any kind of encumbrance whatsoever and no third party right or interest shall be created. He would also undertake to produce the vehicle in question as and when required by the authority concerned.

Let the vehicle be released within a week after submission of the two sureties as indicated above. This application stands disposed off.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Arvind/Ved/- U T