Nayan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65541 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-192 Year-2024 Thana- BODHGAYA District- Gaya ====================================================== Nayan Kumar, Son of Dharmendra Kumar, Resident of Village -Visyat, P.S. - Mescor, District - Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 08-04-2025 Heard Mr. Vinod Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rabindra Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Bodhgaya P.S. Case No. 192 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the mobile of the informant snatched by two unknown miscreants. During course of investigation, one Anjay Raj has given his confessional statement and in his confessional statement, the name of this petitioner has surfaced.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from possession of this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65541 of 2024(5) dt.08-04-2025 2/2 petitioner. His name has been implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Anjay Raj. It has also been submitted that Anjay Raj has been granted bail by learned Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 07.08.2024 in Cr. Misc. No. 52431 of 2024 and the case of this petitioner stands on similar footing. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 11.05.2024.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submitted that petitioner is having criminal antecedent of two cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Gaya in connection with Bodhgaya P.S. Case No. 192 of 2024. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T