Pramod Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.563 of 2007 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 13616 of 2003 =========================================================== Pramod Kumar Singh, son of Bhola Singh, R/o Village Barhara, P.S. Bhore, District Gopalganj .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Director General of Police, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna,

3. The Inspector General of Police, Govt. of Bihar, Gandhi Maidan, Patna,

4. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Human Rights, Bihar, Patna,

5. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Govt. of Bihar, Magadh Range, Gaya,

6. The Superintendent of Police, Jehanabad.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance:

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Rajeeva Roy, Mr. Manoj Kr. Jha and Mr. Kumar Chandrashekhar, Advocates.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Shiv Kumar, AC to GA 3. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 08-03-2018 After making submissions for some time learned counsel for the appellant argued that in the case of other similarly situated constables whose services were terminated on account of illegal appointment the State Government based certain orders passed on the Writ Petition filed by certain constable as per the litigation policy is reconsidering the matter and it is prayed that the appellant's claim for reinstatement be also considered as per the litigation policy of the State Government.

Patna High Court LPA No.563 of 2007 dt.08-03-2018 2/2 If that be so, the appellant is at liberty to approach the competent authority of the State Government for consideration of his case in accordance with the litigation policy or claim parity with other employees who have been granted benefits by the State Government and it is for the State Government to consider and take a decision into the matter within a period of 90 days of filing of the representation by the appellant.

With the aforesaid liberty to the appellant, the matter stands disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Dilip, AR AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 09.03.2018 Transmission Date N/A