Ram Nath Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.48320 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -77 Year- 2014 Thana -PAKRIDAYAL DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Ram Nath Sah S/o Rudal Sah R/o Village Nawada (Amdhuri Tola), P.S. Pakridayal, District East Champaran.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar No.1, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER 20-02-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, who is languishing in custody, seeks bail in a case registered under sections 304B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, is one of the named accused in this case being father- in law of the deceased daughter of the informant, who died within a year of her marriage under unnatural circumstances after suffering for certain demands, torture etc.
Submission is of false implication under some confusion. However, on being aware of actual state of affairs and death of deceased daughter due to cholera parties have entered into amicable settlement and due petition is on
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48320 of 2014 (2) dt.20-02-2015 2/2 record of the Court below.
If it is so, in the event of informant appearing before the court below, on due identification, supports the factum of compromise and contents made therein with his/her free will and consent without any coercion and also stood as one of the bailors, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari in connection with Pakridayal P.S. Case No.77 of 2014, subject to condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date till disposal of the case and in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to be cancelled.
(Akhilesh Chandra, J) Ashwini/- U T