Laxuman Ram @ Laxman Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60762 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2025 Thana- Krishnabraham District- Buxar ====================================================== Laxuman Ram @ Laxman Ram S/o- Late Raj Ballam Ram Village- Chotka Dhakaich PS- Krishna Braham District- Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 15-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Krishna Braham P.S. Case No.37 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 109, 352(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other co-accused persons assaulted the informant and his family members after which they got injuries.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is case and counter case between the parties. He next submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner and specific allegation of assault has been made against Chandan Ram. He next

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60762 of 2025(3) dt.15-11-2025 2/2 submits that petitioner has got clean antecedent as stated in para3 of the bail petition.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that there is direct against the petitioner that he had assaulted one, Bhutali Pawan due to which he got severe injuries and fracture of anterior posterior wall of right frontal sinus and the doctor has opined the injury to be grievous in nature caused by hard and blunt object.

6. On perusal of the First Information Report, impugned order dated 03.07.2025 and case diary along with the injury report, it appears that there is specific allegation against the petitioner that he had assaulted Bhutali Ram and the Doctor of SDH, Dumraon has opined the injury to be grievous in nature caused by hard and blunt substance. So, considering all aspects of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Harshita/- U T